|
Affordable Housing Reader
APA Policy Guide on Factory Built Housing
Adopted by a Chapter Delegate Assembly, March 11, 2001,
New Orleans, Louisiana
Ratified by the APA Board of Directors, March 12, 2001, New Orleans, Louisiana
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES GENERALLY
Factory built housing plays an increasing role in the provision
of housing in all market segments in the United States. With the increasing
use of factory built housing, and the likelihood of continued increasing use,
numerous issues have emerged related to design, quality, integration into established
neighborhoods, siting, and community economics of factory built housing.
This policy guide urges consumers, planners, and government
at all levels to recognize factory built housing as but one form of housing
in a spectrum of housing choices offering distinct characteristics that meet
the needs of many consumers. The guide also recognizes that factory built housing
is a legitimate and acceptable alternative to traditional site-built housing.
The housing guide should be used in reference to APA's Housing Policy Guide.
APA encourages the production of a variety of housing choices to meet the needs
of people at all income levels.
The policy guide further urges communities, through the planning
process, to assess existing planning provisions for factory built housing and
to design and implement new provisions where necessary that are consistent with
the provisions of this policy guide.
For the purposes of this guide, factory built housing shall
be addressed in two sections. The first section addresses manufactured housing
as built under the 1976 Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Manufactured
Housing Code, preempting local code standards, and commonly referred to as "HUD
Code Housing." The second section, to be developed, addresses modular housing.
Modular housing is that form of housing which is built off-site in components
or modules for later assembly on-site in accordance with locally adopted and
enforced building codes.
SECTION I - MANUFACTURED HOUSING
1. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES SPECIFICALLY
Manufactured housing, like all development, must be considered
within the context of local planning goals and objectives. A diversity of housing
types may be used to meet housing needs and development goals, yet some forms
may be less effective in meeting community character, preservation, sustainability,
or aesthetic goals.
The use of manufactured housing has been clearly shown to be
an economically efficient method of providing infill housing in urban areas.
Manufactured housing plays an increasingly significant role in meeting rural
housing needs. Manufactured housing land lease communities, commonly referred
to as trailer or mobile home parks, have provided for consumer housing needs
for decades. The use of manufactured housing in new subdivision development
has proved to be a sound housing development method.
Not withstanding the above, some infill areas, such as historic
or conservation districts, pose legitimate constraints on the use of the manufactured
housing form. Some communities are not suitably equipped with an appropriate
planning process to ensure proper siting and establishment of manufactured homes.
Some land lease communities, particularly older ones, provide a substandard
living environment and are in need of rehabilitation. Many jurisdictions have
not revised planning techniques and requirements to more fully and compatibly
incorporate opportunities for manufactured homes, relying instead on dated,
unfair, and exclusionary regulatory barriers.
Design standards, uniformly applied to all forms of housing,
can resolve these issues. Such standards should be proactive, non-discriminatory,
and thoughtfully developed, rather than adopted in the heat of controversy.
Definitions in zoning ordinances should be clear. A manufactured
house is a house built in conformity with the provisions of the federal HUD
Code. Mobile homes are those built prior to the adoption of the HUD Code. Definition
confusion is a barrier to the placement of manufactured homes.
Aging mobile home or "trailer" parks are an increasing
problem. Many of these places were built prior to the adoption of HUD and local
standards regulating land use. When in substandard condition, these developments
often foment and sustain barriers. Where these places have deteriorated into
substandard environments, they should be upgraded or eliminated using methods
including, but not limited to, code enforcement, urban renewal, relocation assistance,
utility extensions, and condemnation with compensation appropriate. Where persons
are displaced as a result of upgrading, relocation assistance should be offered.
However, implementation of the Manufactured Home Improvement
Act of 2000 (PL 106-569) enacted in December 2000 should facilitate greater
public acceptance and more opportunities for the placement of manufactured housing.
This establishes a consensus committee composed of members from the industry,
users, general interest groups, and public officials selected by procedures
promulgated by the American National Standards Institute. The committee is empowered
to recommend to the HUD Secretary the adoption, revision, and interpretation
of the federal manufacturing and safety standards, procedures, enforcement,
and scope and conduct of monitoring. The act also addresses installation standards,
affordable homeowner finance and protection issues, and the federal preemption,
and is intended to encourage innovative and cost-effective construction techniques.
2. FINDINGS
Since 1976, HUD has regulated manufactured homes under the
Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, which are commonly referred
to as the HUD Code. At the time, these housing units were called "mobile
homes," but in 1980 this designation was changed to "manufactured
home" in recognition of the more durable and less mobile nature of these
homes. Once sited, these homes are rarely moved.
Factory built housing comprised more than one-third of total
new residential units in 1995. As indicated in the table below, manufactured
homes dominated the factory built housing segment, growing from 68 percent in
1995 to 73 percent in 1999.
|
Segmentation of Factory Built Housing
|
|
Type
|
1995
|
1999
|
|
Manufactured homes
|
68%
|
73%
|
|
Panelized homes
|
26%
|
21%
|
|
Modular homes
|
6%
|
6%
|
|
Source: Manufactured Housing Institute
|
A 1985 nationwide survey by APA revealed that manufactured
homes have not only become safer and more durable since the enactment of the
HUD Code in 1976, but their appearance has improved significantly. At the same
time, public acceptance of manufactured homes has increased and some communities
have revised their zoning and subdivision standards that govern manufactured
homes and now permit such homes by right, even in their most restrictive single-family
districts.
Many states have now enacted legislation requiring parity for
manufactured housing with traditional forms of site built housing. Manufacturers
are now designing manufactured housing that in many cases is compatible with
the demands of infill development and sensitive to older established neighborhoods.
Rather than rely on exclusionary zoning, jurisdictions should exercise generally
accepted planning practices, appropriately incorporating manufactured housing.
Balance between housing needs and the need for stability of
existing single-family neighborhoods is vital to communities. Manufactured housing,
if not properly placed and sited, can conflict with established neighborhood
development patterns. Owners will pay some price for siting a home in an urban
environment. This may include additional costs for underpinning, roof material,
siding, compatible design, and other components. These are factors that can
be, and should be applied equally to site built homes. The inherent resistance
to manufactured housing, however, may require more diligence in the design and
administration of regulations.
Well conceived demonstration projects have been used to illustrate
how new housing forms can be successfully incorporated into existing communities
and neighborhoods.
3. POLICY POSITIONS FOR MANUFACTURED HOUSING
GENERAL POLICY POSITION -- APA National and Chapters support
the use of manufactured homes where residential uses are permitted consistent
with locally adopted plans, ordinances, and design requirements and the HUD
Code, where locally adopted plans, ordinances, and design requirements are consistent
with this policy guide.
Reasons to Support General Policy Position:
A. The manufactured home is a major source of housing for
young families, first time homebuyers, older adults, and others with limited
income. In 1999 one-third of all new single-family homes sold were factory
built. Exclusion of this housing source acts to exclude these and other
groups and conflicts with APAs social equity policies.
B. HUD has made expanded use of manufactured housing for
affordable homeownership a key element of its National Home Ownership Strategy.
APA is one of a number of national associations that make up HUDs National
Partners in Homeownership and, along with other members of the partnership,
is helping to formulate and carry out this strategy.
C. Support for manufactured homes as a form of lower cost
housing is consistent with APAs existing housing and social equity policies,
which promote decent housing affordable to low- and moderate-income households
in suitable living environments.
SPECIFIC POLICY POSITIONS
SPECIFIC POLICY POSITION 1. APA National and Chapters support reasonable,
cost effective standards, including design standards, and administrative procedures
for manufactured homes in local zoning ordinances and regulations.
Reasons to support specific policy position 1:
A. Local zoning and subdivision standards should be crafted
so that they encourage good siting and design without unnecessarily limiting
the use of manufactured housing. These standards and the process for applying
them should be applied equally to all housing forms.
B. The HUD Code is a preemptive, uniform construction code
that ensures that a manufactured home, regardless of where it is built in
the U.S., will meet certain publicly adopted standards related to health,
safety, and welfare.
C. A growing number of states have enacted laws that prohibit
the exclusion and unfair regulatory treatment of manufactured homes. Some
states, moreover, call for parity in the regulation of manufactured homes
and site-built housing. The Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000
calls for federal preemption to ensure that disparate state or local requirements
do not affect the uniformity and comprehensiveness of the HUD Code to be
broadly and liberally construed.
D. Manufactured homes should be allowed as a type of housing
accommodated in residential zoning districts at the permitted density for
the district. Issues of design and compatibility arising from manufactured
housing zoning parity should be addressed for all forms of housing and should
be addressed through generally accepted standards of planning practice.
SPECIFIC POLICY POSITION 2. APA National and Chapters encourage the development
and adoption of model definitions, siting standards, and design standards to
achieve local design and compatibility goals.
Reasons to Support Specific Policy Position 2:
Many communities are unprepared for the accommodation
of manufactured housing and are unaware of legal obligations to accommodate
manufactured housing in residential areas. APA can play a leadership role
in preparing communities to accommodate manufactured housing in a satisfactory
manner.
SPECIFIC POLICY POSITION 3. APA National and Chapters encourage states
to take steps to ensure that installation and anchoring requirements for manufactured
homes are adequate. Where unique environmental conditions exist, specific life
safety standards should be coordinated with those required by HUD. These standards
should be consistent with those set forth in the American National Standards
Institutes publication, Manufactured Home Installation (published in 1994).
Reasons to Support Specific Policy Position 3:
About half of the states have adopted installation standards
for manufactured homes that require these homes to be installed on properly
engineered foundation systems. When properly anchored, manufactured homes
perform on an equal basis with site-built dwellings in unique environmental
conditions.
SPECIFIC POLICY POSITION 4. APA National and Chapters support the rapid
implementation of the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000 and activation
of the consensus committee so that new technologies, materials, and industry
and consumer input may be responsively incorporated. The act provides for enforcement
of federal installation standards if states do not adopt their own standards
meeting or exceeding federal standards within five years of the adoption of
the act. APA National and Chapters urge the immediate adoption of the federal
standards and further urge states to adopt standards without waiting the maximum
five years to act.
Reasons to Support Specific Policy Position 4:
A. Typically, model codes such as BOCA and ICBO are revised
on a three-year cycle. The HUD Code should undergo a similar revision schedule.
B. There is a wide range of installation requirements across
states, and many states have no installation code at all.
SPECIFIC POLICY POSITION 5. APA National and Chapters support and encourage
the application of health and safety laws and the development of measures designed
to achieve the rehabilitation and modernization of aging and substandard land
lease communities, commonly referred to as mobile home parks, while addressing
the displacement of residents.
Reasons to Support Specific Policy Position 5:
Many aging land lease communities across the nation provide
substandard living environments. The modernization and rehabilitation of
these places would eliminate these conditions and improve the livability
of the communities in which they exist.
SPECIFIC POLICY POSITION 6. APA National and Chapters strongly encourage
voluntary certification of land lease community owners and managers through
education and training.
Reasons to Support Specific Policy Position 6:
Professional management would result in better and more
stable land lease communities, thereby assisting in the goal of providing
adequate living environments.
SPECIFIC POLICY POSITION 7. APA National and Chapters support legislation
that creates tax equity and consistent valuation among the various housing forms.
Reasons to Support Specific Policy Position 7:
An additional barrier to the placement of manufactured
housing is the treatment of manufactured housing as personal property. Many
jurisdictions oppose manufactured housing because units are often taxed
as personal property rather than real property, producing lower tax revenue
that traditional housing forms, which are taxed only as real property. Similarly,
personal property financing carries higher consumer interest rates than
mortgage loans for real property. Several states have adopted laws declaring
manufactured housing, permanently installed, as real property for tax purposes.
Statues have also been adopted permitting surrender of the estate title
so that a real estate mortgage may be obtained, and that the mortgage is
insurable without special endorsement.
SPECIFIC POLICY POSITION 8. APA National and Chapters should partner with
the manufactured housing industry to: (1) Implement higher quality site planning
and design: (2) promote a greater emphasis on community outreach; and (3) increase
the use of various print and electronic media. The goal of this effort would
be to better inform the American consumer and community decision makers about
the positive attributes and opportunities of factory built housing.
Reasons to Support Specific Policy Position 8:
A history of poor planning and design and development problems
have negatively affected the image of manufactured housing in many communities
and among the general public. The industry has the responsibility to work
with such agencies and organizations as HUD and APA to help make the case
for more widespread acceptance of this dwelling type and its positive role
in overall community development planning.
SECTION II - MODULAR HOUSING
(To be developed)
Exceptions from General Policy Position or Specific Policy
Positions supported by specific finding or reasoning.
NONE TO DATE
This policy is subject to amendment for the purposes of the
following:
1. Adding findings or supplementing previous findings with new data or interpretations;
and
2. Adding Specific Policy Positions based on new findings or reasoning that
tend to add to or qualify, but not reject entirely, the General Policy Position,
one or more Specific Policy Positions, or one or more Exceptions from Policy
Positions.
Authority
ENDNOTES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
American Planning Association. Planning and Community Equity.
APA Planners Press: Chicago. 1994.
Gordan, Rose. Code Comparison Summary, University of Illinois
at Urbana-Champaign School of Architecture-Building Research Council. December
1997.
Sanders, Welford. Manufactured Housing Site Development
Guide. Planning Advisory Service Report No. 445. American Planning Association:
Chicago. April 1993.
----------. Regulating Manufactured Housing. Planning
Advisory Service Report No. 398. American Planning Association: Chicago. April
1986.
----------. Manufactured Housing: Regulation, Design Innovations, and Development
Options. Planning Advisory Service Report No. 478. American Planning Association:
Chicago. July 1998.
|