Description
Today's urban resident is seeking a more flexible, sustainable environment — representing a unique, diverse, vibrant, and responsible way of living — as an alternative to the typical development patterns of suburban and semi-urban sprawl. Can urban design help create this type of sustainable urbanism?
Grid / Street / Place presents a unique approach to understanding urban design through scientific, empirical research. The authors examined more than 100 successful projects throughout North America to identify differences and commonalities, and they discovered universal elements that characterize sustainable urban districts. By applying these essential elements, designers and developers can recreate and extend the experience of successful places to their communities. Myriad plans, sections, diagrams, and charts illustrate how each district works — at an extremely detailed level. Concrete examples, as opposed to generalities, make Grid / Street / Place a must-read for anyone interested in the working strategies of urban design. Silver Medal for Architecture at the Independent Publishers Awards
Table of Contents
See full table of contents
INTRODUCTION
SECTION 1: CLASSIC DISTRICTS
Classic Districts Key Map
District Views
Classic District Comparison Chart
Classic Districts Scale Comparison
Shopping/Working Districts
Country Club Plaza, Kansas City, MO
Highland Park Village, Dallas, TX
Mizner Park, Boca Raton, FL
Reston Town Center, Reston, VA
State Street, Santa Barbara, CA
Westwood Village, Los Angeles, CA
Worth Avenue, Palm Beach, FL
Transit Villages
Forest Hills Gardens, Queens, NY
Market Square, Lake Forest, IL
Shaker Square, Cleveland, OH
New Communities
Celebration, FL
Coral Gables, FL
Malaga Cove, Palos Verdes Estates, CA
Mariemont, OH
Summary Findings
SECTION 2: MIXED USE DISTRICTS
Mixed Use Districts Key Map
District Views
Figure Ground
Circulation/Block Size
Land Use Mix
Commercial Footprint
Residential Mix
Open Space Network
Charts
Summary Findings
SECTION 3: SQUARES, GREENS, AND PARKS
Public Spaces Scale Comparison
Squares: Essential Characteristics
Greens: Essential Characteristics
Parks: Essential Characteristics
Squares, Greens, and Parks Key Map
Spatial Enclosure
Public Space Scale Comparison
Squares
Southlake Town Square Park, Southlake, TX
Southlake Town Square Plaza, Southlake, TX
Victoria Gardens, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Jamison Square, Portland, OR
Legacy Town Center, Plano, TX
Pioneer Courthouse Square, Portland, OR
Pershing Square, Los Angeles, CA
Union Square, San Francisco, CA
Belmar Town Center, Lakewood, CO
Campus Martius, Detroit, MI
Post Office Square, Boston, MA
Santana Row, San Jose, CA
Maguire Gardens, Los Angeles, CA
Rockefeller Center, New York, NY
Times Square, New York, NY
Greens
Olympic Sculpture Park, Seattle, WA
Yerba Buena Gardens, San Francisco, CA
Addison Circle Park, Addison, TX
Union Square, New York, NY
Bryant Park, New York, NY
Parks
Bellevue Downtown Park, Bellevue, WA
Centennial Park, Atlanta, GA
Millennium Park, Chicago, IL
Public Garden, Boston, MA
Charts
Summary Findings
SECTION FOUR: SHOPPING STREETS
Shopping Streets: Configurations
Relationship to Arterial
Typical Section
Zoned Sidewalk
Other Options
Shopping Streets Key Map
Spatial Enclosure / Street Dimensions
Shopping Streets Scale Comparison
Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena, CA
Rodeo Drive, Beverly Hills, CA
Third Street Promenade, Santa Monica, CA
Venice Boardwalk, Venice, CA
Summary Findings
SECTION FIVE: PLACES
Places: Configurations
Passages: Configurations
Places Key Map
Spatial Enclosure / Places Dimension
Places Scale Comparison
Americana at Brand, Glendale, CA
Edgemar, Santa Monica, CA
The Grove, Los Angeles, CA
L.A. Live, Los Angeles, CA
One Colorado, Pasadena, CA
Via Rodeo, Beverly Hills, CA
Summary Findings
ESSAY
CONCLUSION
INDEX
Back to Top
Reviews
See all reviews
|
|