| #e.22377 | Monday 7:30AM to
Thursday 1:00PM April 1-4,
2013 | CM | Multipart |
Walk The TalkNational Association of Environmental ProfessionalsLos Angeles, CA The National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) and the California Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) will jointly host their annual meetings JW Marriott LA Live Hotel in Los Angeles, California April 1-4, 2013. The theme of the conference is “Walk-the-Talk,” highlighting the best efforts by private- and public-sector environmental professionals in the areas of regulations, analyses, project construction, and project operations. The focus of the conference will be on highlighting the work of environmental professionals that achieves the spirit of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), while balancing the needs of economic development, quality of life, and conservation and protection of the environment. The conference is directed toward a broad range of environmental professionals, including impact assessment practitioners, land use planners, regulatory agency personnel, technical specialists, and private- and public-sector personnel engaged in the preparation and review of environmental compliance documents and related permits.
The day preceding the main conference (Monday, April 1) will host two plenary sessions: (1) a Climate Adaptation Planning Symposium, which will consist of three panels: the first will be noted scientists engaged in the assessment of climate change, the second will consist of federal and state regulatory agencies setting guidelines for communities to prepare for climate conservation and adaptation, and the third will present case studies as to how two of the Nation’s largest ports are preparing for potential climate change. and (2) a National Environmental Policy Act Basics Training Workshop.
The conference will consist of seven concurrent tracks consisting of 49 technical presentations related to a variety of environmental issues: National Environmental Policy Act, the California Environmental Quality Act, air quality and climate change, cultural resources, wildlife and wetland resources, sustainability, energy, transportation, visual resources, land use and planning, and public outreach. The conference will close with updates on legislation and legal case updates for both the National Environmental Policy Act and the California Environmental Quality Act. There are four mobile workshops to give practitioners an in-field opportunity related to four key environmental issues areas: climate adaptation mobile workshop at the Port of Los Angeles, rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of historic buildings, LEED sustainable green building design, and a renewable energy demonstration project. Several keynote speaker sessions will feature prominent speakers from the environmental field. The conference will be held in an outstanding, state-of-the-art conference facility at the JW Marriott Hotel, located in the vibrant LA Live complex in downtown Los Angeles. The hotel and conference facility sport a front-row seat to some of Los Angeles’ top attractions, include the Staples Center, the Nokia Theatre, Regal Cinemas, and a wide variety of shops and restaurants. In addition, despite the car-centered nature of greater Los Angeles, many world-class attractions can be reached via public transit which is easily accessible from the complex.
More (183 Ratings) | |
#a.172520Wednesday April 3,
9:45AM to 11:15AMAEP Climate Change Committee Presents 'The Idiots Guide To Climate Action Planning' |
CM |
1.50 | This session will provide planners with the most up-to-date practices in developing qualified climate action plans.
AEP’s Climate Change Committee will guid ... more This session will provide planners with the most up-to-date practices in developing qualified climate action plans.
AEP’s Climate Change Committee will guide participants through the ins and outs of planning for community-wide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions in a GHG Reduction Plan / Climate Action Plan. The Climate Change Committee members are in the trenches of climate action planning. Collectively, the panelists represent firms that have prepared hundreds of GHG emissions inventories and GHG Reduction Plans / Climate Action Plans throughout California and the Nation. The Climate Change Committee’s panel of experts will outline the critical components of a community Climate Action Plan for it to be considered a Qualified GHG emissions reduction strategy for CEQA Streamlining under Section 15183.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The panelists will outline the primary GHG emissions sectors that should be included in the inventories (baseline and forecast(s)) for a Qualified Plan and additional sectors that should be considered based on the policy goals of the community. California Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32) requires the state to achieve 1990 levels by 2020. The panel will detail options that communities have when establishing local GHG emission reduction targets consistent with the AB 32 goal. In addition, panelists will discuss the benefits of addressing other target years, including targets based on regional targets outlined in an applicable Sustainable Communities Strategies under California Senate Bill 375 and the long-term target established under Executive Order S-03-05 (80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050). A GHG Reduction Plan / Climate Action Plan details the measures the local government will take to reduce GHG emissions to achieve the GHG reduction target(s). The panelists will identify the best practices for types of measures that should be considered, including measures included as a result of comments received from agencies and organizations during public circulation of the Plan. Economic analyses of the measures as a critical component of the planning process will also be presented. For GHG Reduction Planning / Climate Action Planning efforts in California, future development projects can take advantage of the CEQA streamlining provisions. The Climate Change Committee will detail the key elements of a monitoring program to ensure that the jurisdiction is on-tract to achieving the GHG reduction target(s). Examples of innovative mechanisms cities/counties have created to evaluate consistency of a project with the adopted GHG Reduction Plan / Climate Action Plan will be highlighted.
Instructors: Michael Hendrix Michael is the practice leader for Atkins' air quality and climate change services with over 14 years of experience in GHG emissions inventories, climate action plans, and GHG analysis. He has conducted public outreach efforts to inform local and state officials on air quality, GHG emissions, and climate change issues. Daniel Rubins Daniel is a Senior Transportation Engineer with Fehr & Peers, and has more than eight years of experience in transportation planning and traffic engineering. He has served as project manager or project engineer on transportation impact analysis studies, environmental impact reports, street design standards studies, site access and on-site circulation studies, transportation operations analysis, and Citywide model development projects. His experience includes the application of local and regional travel demand models and CAPCOA research to estimate vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and VMT reduction for Climate Action Plans and or General Plan analysis in Mountain View, Morgan Hill, Sunnyvale, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, Gilroy, Los Gatos, and San Luis Obispo County. Cheryl Laskowski Cheryl Laskowski is a climate change specialist at AECOM. Dr. Laskowski has advanced degrees in climate change ecology, and energy and environmental analysis. She has extensive academic and applied experience in climate change work, including conducting primary research in air quality monitoring, preparing greenhouse gas emissions inventories, producing climate action plans, and conducting GHG and air quality analyses for a variety of CEQA and NEPA projects. She has or is managing several climate action plans, which focus on mitigation strategies and meeting the goals of AB 32; preparing synthesis reports on GHGs in rangelands for BLM; prepared CEQA GHG Thresholds for Determining Significance for the County of San Diego; and conducting CEQ/NEPA impact assessments for GHGs for EIRs and (M)NDs. Dr. Laskowski has extensive experience communicating through written work, having published in academic journals and written numerous reports; and oral presentations, having lectured university courses, presented research at international conferences, and communicated information to government officials, tribal leaders, and the public. Cheryl has worked in the academic, public, and non-profit sectors before joining AECOM. Dave Mitchell Dave Mitchell, First Carbon Solutions -Michael Brandman Associates: Dave has more than 22 years of experience in air quality, land use, and climate change planning, including long-range planning, plan implementation, and managing large multi-disciplinary projects. Dave has served as project manager for climate action plans, greenhouse gas inventories and numerous air quality and greenhouse gas analyses for CEQA documents. Dave possesses extensive experience in air quality analysis; CEQA lead agency and commenting functions; plan development; rule development; grant and incentive programs; and land use, transportation, and air quality connections. Expertise includes climate action plans, air quality elements, emission inventory development, CEQA compliance, regulation development, state implementation plan issues, air quality impact assessments, air mitigation quantification methods, and air pollution control technology. | |
#a.172508Tuesday April 2,
3:30PM to 5:00PMAssessing sensitive landscapes |
CM |
1.50 | To learn about specific techniques to document historic and scenic landscapes as well as viewshed delineation methods. ... more To learn about specific techniques to document historic and scenic landscapes as well as viewshed delineation methods. Instructors: Craig Johnson Craig Johnson, RLA, Education: B.S., Landscape Architecture, Ball State University, 1997, Craig is a registered landscape architect, environmental planner, and senior project manager at LSD with over 15 years of experience. He specializes in visual resources and cultural landscapes. Craig is currently providing project management for two CLIs and two National Register nominations', one for Tonto National Monument and the other for the Cross Canyon Corridor in Grand Canyon National Park. He has also completed numerous visual resource inventories and analyses, including transportation, energy, and cultural-visual resource assessment projects. Robert Sullivan Robert Sullivan (M.L.A., Landscape Architecture, University of Illinois, Urbana, 1987) is an environmental scientist in Argonne National Laboratory's Environmental Science Division. He conducts applied research concerning the visual impacts of utility-scale energy generation. His current research focuses on visual perception of utility-scale wind, solar, and electric transmission facilities, and software development for visual impact risk analysis and visual impact simulation. He is currently developing guidance for federal agencies on evaluation of visual impact analyses, and on best management practices for reducing visual impacts of solar, wind, and geothermal energy systems. He is also part of an interdisciplinary team that conducts environmental impact assessments for national energy programs, including renewable and fossil energy development and associated energy transmission. He has prepared visual impact analyses for programmatic environmental impact statements for onshore and offshore wind energy, solar energy, electric transmission, and several federal fossil energy programs. (25 years experience) Mark Meyer Mark Meyer, a landscape architect, joined the National Park Service as a visual resource specialist after 30 years in the private sector. His experience includes natural resource planning, visual inventory and impact assessment as well traditional land use and site planning and landscape design. Mark is duty-stationed in Lakewood, Colorado as part of the Air Resources Division. His duties are national in scope and he is assisting park managers, regional offices and the Washington Office in the protection of shared scenic views that extend beyond the boundaries of NPS managed areas. Such views are inspirational and often integral to the experience of visiting a national park or historic trail. While much of his focus is on utility-scale renewable energy, and transmission projects within these shared viewsheds, he will also be working to develop a consistent approach to visual resources throughout the service including national trails, wild and scenic rivers and cultural landscapes. | |
#a.172496Tuesday April 2,
9:45AM to 11:15AMBest Practice Principles for Environmental Assessments |
CM |
1.50 | The Best Practice Principles for Environmental Assessments pilot project is focused on the delineation of Best Practice Principles which can be used in the prep ... more The Best Practice Principles for Environmental Assessments pilot project is focused on the delineation of Best Practice Principles which can be used in the preparation of environmental assessments (EAs) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. This NEPA pilot project applies to the preparation of EAs by all Federal agencies. The concept is that the recommended Best Practice Principles can be used in EAs prepared for agency-specific actions. EAs are a critical threshold-determining document in the NEPA process. Usage of the experience-based Best Practice Principles will aid agencies in the preparation of EAs that are more timely, cost-effective, and relevant to incorporating environmental issues in the decision making process. Instructors: David Keys, CEP David Keys, CEP, is the NOAA Fisheries Service, Southeast Region, National Environmental Policy Act Coordinator where he is responsible for compliance with the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations throughout the NOAA Fisheries, Southeast Region. He is a Certified Environmental Professional in environmental documentation and earned his Master of Arts degree in environmental studies from the University of Illinois and his Bachelor of Science degree in forest management from Southern Illinois University. He is an adjunct faculty member at the University of South Florida, St. Petersburg Campus, where he teaches NEPA implementation. He earned the NEPA certificate from the Duke Environmental Leadership Program. He is a general member of the National Association of Environmental Professionals where he is the current chair of the Oceans Track and current vice chair of the Peak Oil Committee. He is a professional member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Larry Canter Dr. Larry Canter is Professor Emeritus from the University of Oklahoma (August, 2000), during the 1990s he was the Sun Company Chair of Ground Water Hydrology, George Lynn Cross Research Professor, and Director, Environmental and Ground Water Institute. He is now engaged in teaching EIA-related short courses and consulting on the preparation and review of impact studies and the development of EIA policies, procedures, methods, and tools. In 2008, he was Co-Chair of the International Association of Impact Assessment's (IAIA's) Special Topic Meeting on Assessing and Managing Cumulative Environmental Effects. In 2009, he received the prestigious Rose-Hulman Award from IAIA. He received his Ph.D. in environmental health engineering from the University of Texas, M.S. in sanitary engineering from the University of Illinois, and B.E. in civil engineering from Vanderbilt University. Robert Senner Dr. Robert Senner leads environmental programs and teams to support engineering design, construction planning, and regulatory permitting for natural resource, energy, and infrastructure projects. He has managed, prepared, or contributed to over 60 NEPA documents and is a specialist in indirect and cumulative effects assessment, mitigation strategies for adaptive management, and sustainability design and metrics. He received his undergraduate degree in biology from Yale University, conducted postgraduate research at the University of St. Andrews and Caltech, and received his Ph.D. in public policy from The University of Texas at Austin. He is currently a senior project manager and technical practice leader with CH2M HILL in Seattle Ron Deverman Ron Deverman is Associate Vice-President for HNTB, a national engineering, architecture and planning firm, managing environmental impact assessment projects for transportation infrastructure improvements such as transit, passenger and freight rail, roadways, and bridges. Ron has 28-years experience in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) with special expertise in community impact assessment, cumulative effects analysis, and federal environmental regulations, such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, National Historic Preservation Act, and Endangered Species Act. His education includes a BS in civil/environmental engineering from the University of Illinois in Urbana, an MA in literature and creative writing from the University of Illinois in Springfield, and post-graduate studies in NEPA and related environmental studies. Ron is the Immediate Past President of the National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP). He has also chaired NAEP's national NEPA Symposium, NEPA Working Group, Transportation Working Group (co-founder), and 27th Annual Conference (Dearborn, Michigan). | |
#a.172529Wednesday April 3,
1:45PM to 3:15PMBetter NEPA Practice |
CM |
1.50 L1.50 | As new technologies emerge they have to undergo NEPA review. This session describe experience applying NEPA to alternative energy projects and discusses how to ... more As new technologies emerge they have to undergo NEPA review. This session describe experience applying NEPA to alternative energy projects and discusses how to trading offs between environmental benefits and impacts. The session also will cover practical steps to take when a NEPA process is litigated. As a tool to verify a complete NEPA analysis has been conducted the session includes a listing and discussion of the essential parts of NEPA review. Instructors: Timothy Lavallee Timothy Lavallee, P.E. Mr. Lavallee is the founder and president of LPES, Inc.; a Virginia based engineering and planning small business enterprise specializing in air quality, noise, and transportation planning. Mr. Lavallee has more than 20 years of experience in the environmental field, and has managed or been directly involved in several hundred projects for the DoD (all branches), MDA, NASA, USACE, FERC, DOE, GSA, and USCG. These efforts primarily include preparing Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) and Environmental Assessments (EA). Mr. Lavallee is proficient with virtually all USEPA air dispersion models, and all standard noise prediction models. In addition, he has extensive experience assessing the effects of noise and shock on humans, threatened and endangered species, and marine mammals. Mr. Lavallee previously worked for Lockheed Martin at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Langley Research Center in flight test support and environmental noise reduction. Mr. Lavallee has numerous professional and technical publications in the areas of air quality and acoustics. Mark Oliver Mark Oliver is a CH2M HILL principal project manager with more than 25 years of experience in California water resources planning projects. His project assignments have included coordinating engineering and environmental documentation for controversial water resources management programs with heated public debate and intense media coverage. As a manager of major, high-profile environmental document projects, Mark typically directs the impact analysis, as well as public and agency coordination aspects of these projects. These activities include impact assessment and approach development, leading public scoping meetings on behalf of lead agencies to identify public and agency concerns, making public presentations, and responding to public and agency comments. He specializes in developing regional solutions involving numerous federal, state, and local interests as well as assisting project proponents in developing projects that account for and anticipate environmental and political concerns and issues. Owen Schmidt Owen L. Schmidt, BA, MA, JD, is an environmental consultant and NEPA trainer living in Portland, Oregon. He has more than 32 years of service with the Federal Government, last serving as Senior Counsel with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the General Counsel in Portland, Oregon, where he advised the Forest Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and other USDA agencies in Washington and Oregon. He was also a Special Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Oregon. Before joining USDA in 1991, he was an attorney for the Bonneville Power Administration, where he joined the legal staff after several years as an Environmental Specialist. Mr. Schmidt received his J.D. from Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College (1977), and a B.A. (1969) and M.A. (1973) in biology from St. Cloud State University, Minnesota. Mr. Schmidt is a frequent author and lecturer on the National Environmental Policy Act. His book, 'NEPA Models and Case Lists' is now in the fourth edition. He served as a Vice-Chair of the American Bar Association's Book Publication Committee for the Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources and as a Vice President for the Ninth Circuit, The Federal Bar Association. He was the Editor of Oregon Birds, a quarterly journal of Oregon Field Ornithologists, for 14 years (1985-99), and is a long-time member of the Oregon Bird Records Committee | |
#a.172536Wednesday April 3,
3:30PM to 5:00PMCEQA Exemptions: Not All They're Cracked Up to Be? |
CM |
1.50 L1.50 | Development projects requiring only the issuance of building permits or other minor administrative approvals that are customarily thought of as exempt from the ... more Development projects requiring only the issuance of building permits or other minor administrative approvals that are customarily thought of as exempt from the reaches of the California Environmental Quality Act ('CEQA') are under attack. Building permits, considered by most to be ministerial approvals that are statutorily exempt from CEQA, are being challenged as inherently discretionary. Further, lesser discretionary approvals that traditionally are considered categorically exempt from CEQA (e.g., alterations to or rehabilitation of existing buildings, in-fill development and other minor development) are increasingly vulnerable to litigation. Decisions like Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 656, which is pending review by the California Supreme Court in 2013, have significantly expanded the definition of what constitutes an 'unusual circumstance' that would override an otherwise-applicable Categorical Exemption. Unlike Statutory Exemptions, which are not subject to general exceptions, the use of Categorical Exemptions can be limited by the umbrella exceptions, including the catch-all 'unusual circumstances' exception. If the lead agency establishes that a project is within an exempt class, the burden shifts to the party challenging the exemption to demonstrate, using substantial evidence, that the project falls into one of these exceptions. Berkeley Hillside, however, has created significant anxiety regarding the use of any Categorical Exemption. This panel will explore all aspects of the Categorical Exemption process. Panelists are anticipated to include developer's land use counsel, an agency planner, an environmental consultant, and petitioners' litigation counsel with first-hand experience opposing Categorical Exemptions. The panel will: (1) discuss what Categorical Exemptions are and when they may be appropriately used for development projects; (2) explore the vulnerabilities of Categorical Exemptions; (3) identify little known but potentially important CEQA provisions related to Categorical Exemptions; and (4) provide guidelines for determining whether your project may be eligible for a Categorical Exemption and recommend best practices to substantiate the use of a Categorical Exemption in the administrative record. Instructors: Brady McShane Brady R. McShane, Partner, Real Estate & Land Use Mr. McShane's practice focuses on land use, government, and real estate development matters, where he advises clients on the numerous regulatory, environmental, political and technical issues involved in developing property in California. For the last 11 years, he has represented developers, corporations, individuals, institutions and nonprofit organizations in all aspects of the land use and entitlement process, including the development of residential master-planned communities, condominiums, mixed-use, hotels, shopping centers, big box retail stores, specialty retail stores, performing arts centers, sports stadiums and self-storage facilities. He regularly appears in hearings before legislative bodies, agencies, boards and commissions. Sean Matsler Sean Matsler, Senior Land Use Attorney, Real Estate & Land Use, Mr. Matsler's practice focuses on land use with an emphasis on securing entitlements for controversial residential, commercial, and institutional real estate development projects. He advises clients on compliance with local planning and zoning regulations, the California Coastal Act, and the California Environmental Quality Act, guiding them through the entitlement process from site selection to project approval. Mr. Matsler understands the litigation risk associated with California Environmental Quality Act compliance, having represented clients on both sides of such litigation. He has also appeared before both state and local administrative bodies to secure approvals on behalf of clients. Over the course of nine years of practice, his clients have included residential, commercial, and mixed use developers, as well as churches, temples, schools, banks, REITs, and individual property owners. | |
#a.172547Tuesday April 2,
1:45PM to 3:15PMCEQA Hot Topics Roundtable |
CM |
1.50 | Join leading environmental professionals for a timely iscussion and exchange of ideas on the latest hot topics affecting the profession. Members of the panel wi ... more Join leading environmental professionals for a timely iscussion and exchange of ideas on the latest hot topics affecting the profession. Members of the panel will discuss current issues that lead agencies throughout the State are tackling such as preparing policy level environmental analyses and innovative strategies for CEQA tiering and streamlining. The panel may delve into thoughts on the efforts to modify or overhaul
CEQA and other overall trends in the profession. There will also be an overview of changes that the State Clearinghouse is considering for document submittals and the functions of CEQAnet. Instructors: Devon Muto Devon Muto is a senior manager with ICF International, leading ICF’s environmental planning in southern California. He has extensive experience with planning, policy, permitting, and environmental analysis projects.
Prior to joining ICF, Mr. Muto was chief of the County of San Diego’s Advanced Planning Division, where he completed the county’s general plan update and associated environmental impact report (EIR). He was responsible for various San Diego County projects, such as its Climate Action Plan, Energy Upgrade California, Wind Energy Ordinance and Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Boutique Wineries Ordinance EIR, and Ramona and Alpine Town Center Plans. In addition, he provided oversight to San Diego County's Multiple Species Conservation Program and Energy Program.
Mr. Muto has also worked as a land use and environmental planning consultant. He currently serves as the administrative vice president of the Association of Environmental Professionals. | |
#a.172523Wednesday April 3,
9:45AM to 11:15AMCEQA Practicum: Determining Significance |
CM |
1.50 L1.50 | Determining the significance of an effect on the environment is the crux of the CEQA environmental review process. The statute has been written to empower citi ... more Determining the significance of an effect on the environment is the crux of the CEQA environmental review process. The statute has been written to empower citizens to hold public agencies accountable for their decisions about significance through the fair argument standard. What constitutes enough of a factual basis behind a fair argument to qualify as 'substantial evidence?' How should significance criteria be articulated? In cumulative impact analysis, what constitutes a 'considerable contribution?' Are the 'mandatory findings of significance' really mandatory? What role do mitigation measures play in making the significance determinations? This session will focus on the practical approaches for determining whether an environmental effect is significant at the time a lead agency is deciding the appropriate type of environmental document and during environmental document's preparation. The specialized issue of greenhouse gases (GHG) presents different challenges, because multiple methods for determining significance have emerged from authoritative sources and the science is still evolving. Based on the CEQA statute, guidelines and case law, topics will include the fair argument and substantial evidence standards, use of thresholds, cumulatively considerable contributions, and consistency with plans that mitigate environmental effects Instructors: Sydney Coatsworth AICP Sydney B. Coatsworth is a Principal with Ascent Environmental, with 26 years of experience in CEQA and NEPA Practice, geomorphology, water resources. Her practice spans the gamut, including projects related to water resources, wastewater treatment, floodplain management, affordable housing, urban development, natural resources management, and environmental policy and regulation. She is an expert and educator in environmental compliance pursuant to CEQA, NEPA, and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) laws and regulations. Sydney specializes in managing large-scale and complex environmental compliance projects and has overseen the preparation of hundreds of environmental documents. Gary Jakobs AICP Gary Jakobs is a Principal with Ascent Environmental. With 28 years of experience, he has a diverse background in environmental studies for projects throughout California and the western United States. He is a CEQA and NEPA expert who develops practice methods, leads emerging trends, and helps his clients understand applicable regulations and case law. His expertise encompasses the federal and California endangered species acts and wetlands and water quality regulations. Gary’s project management experience includes multi-task, on-call environmental assignments for projects throughout California, large-scale development plans, in-fill urban development, wastewater treatment infrastructure, industrial and energy facilities, telecommunications installations, prisons, and airport expansions. Honey Walters Honey Walters is a Principal at Ascent Environmental. She is an expert in air quality impact and compliance analysis, GHG analysis and reduction planning, and noise impact analysis and mitigation planning. Honey’s professional experience of over 12 years in the private and public sectors is coupled with a strong educational background in air pollution chemistry and climate change science. She holds a Bachelor and Master of Science degrees in Environmental Chemistry and Atmospheric Science. She has worked directly with numerous agencies including the California Air Resources Board, California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, and the Attorney General’s office on the development of GHG thresholds of significance, analytical methods, and reduction strategies for California. | |
#a.172538Wednesday April 3,
1:45PM to 3:15PMCEQA Practicum: Developing Alternatives |
CM |
1.50 L1.50 | Consideration of alternatives in an EIR is a critical, but often tricky element of CEQA compliance. The 'rule of reason' directs the definition of alternatives ... more Consideration of alternatives in an EIR is a critical, but often tricky element of CEQA compliance. The 'rule of reason' directs the definition of alternatives, but it creates a great deal of room for interpretation. How many and what type of alternatives are necessary to establish a range of reasonable alternatives? The answer needs to take into account the project objectives, environmental analysis findings, and community concerns. While CEQA alternatives analysis is not as detailed as the project's impact analysis, how much information is needed for defensibility? How have court decisions shaped alternatives analysis? How must the alternatives analysis be adapted when you are preparing a joint CEQA and NEPA document? At the end of the EIR process, determinations must be made pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 to consider and dismiss the alternatives that are not approved by the lead agency. What are best approaches for linking the CEQA Findings to the EIR alternatives analysis? Learn about proven practices for defining, evaluating, and documenting alternatives in your EIR, as well as effective methods for making and supporting the CEQA Findings regarding alternatives. Instructors: Gary Jakobs Gary Jakobs is a Principal with Ascent Environmental. With 28 years of experience, he has a diverse background in environmental studies for projects throughout California and the western United States. He is a CEQA and NEPA expert who develops practice methods, leads emerging trends, and helps his clients understand applicable regulations and case law. His expertise encompasses the federal and California endangered species acts and wetlands and water quality regulations. Gary’s project management experience includes multi-task, on-call environmental assignments for projects throughout California, large-scale development plans, in-fill urban development, wastewater treatment infrastructure, industrial and energy facilities, telecommunications installations, prisons, and airport expansions. Curtis Alling AICP Curtis E. Alling is a Principal at Ascent Environmental. Curtis is a recognized expert in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and a specialist in the climate change and natural resources issues. Trained in wildlife science and natural resources planning, his projects are very diverse, including urban, agricultural, wetland, vernal pool, valley, Delta, coastal, Coast Range, foothill, and Sierra settings. Project specialties include ecosystem restoration, renewable energy, water resources, conservation planning, hazardous materials, solid waste, flood control, community planning, regional and state park, trail, rail transit, and large-scale development projects. | |
#a.172516Wednesday April 3,
8:00AM to 9:30AMCEQA Practicum: Subsequent CEQA Reviews |
CM |
1.50 L1.50 | When an already approved plan or project is modified, must undergo a phased approval, or is delayed to the point where environmental circumstances change substa ... more When an already approved plan or project is modified, must undergo a phased approval, or is delayed to the point where environmental circumstances change substantially, a lead agency faces the question about what kind of supplemental review is required by CEQA, if any. Applying the criteria in State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 ' 15164 to determine the appropriate documentation can call for considerable judgment (aka, negotiating the gray areas). When would you consider a significant effect resulting from a project change to truly be 'new' or 'substantially more severe?' If a new significant impact is identified and a feasible mitigation measure is adopted, can a subsequent EIR or supplement to an EIR be avoided? What are the most common methods for providing substantial evidence to support your decision about the choice of supplemental environmental document? What are the procedural requirements (e.g., is a new Notice of Preparation required)? How have court decisions influenced the practice of supplemental reviews? Learn about the legal requirements for conducting supplemental reviews and practical strategies for ensuring that your environmental review approach is defensible. Instructors: Curtis Alling AICP Curtis E. Alling is a Principal at Ascent Environmental. Curtis is a recognized expert in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and a specialist in the climate change and natural resources issues. Trained in wildlife science and natural resources planning, his projects are very diverse, including urban, agricultural, wetland, vernal pool, valley, Delta, coastal, Coast Range, foothill, and Sierra settings. Project specialties include ecosystem restoration, renewable energy, water resources, conservation planning, hazardous materials, solid waste, flood control, community planning, regional and state park, trail, rail transit, and large-scale development projects. Amanda Olekszulin Amanda Olekszulin is a Principal at Ascent Environmental with 15 years of experience in CEQA and NEPA Practice, land development projects. Her career has focused on the management of complex and important projects, including brownfield redevelopments, master planned communities, prisons, water resources development, wastewater treatment plants, waterfront developments, and other public infrastructure projects. She has broad marketplace recognition for CEQA and NEPA document leadership and management accomplishments, often on controversial public and private development projects. | |
#a.172503Tuesday April 2,
1:45PM to 3:15PMCan CERCLA Decision-Making be Improved with Broader NEPA-like Consideration? |
CM |
1.50 | This panel will compare the NEPA and CERCLA processes exploring the specific objectives and exclusions of each policy, identifying changes since each policy was ... more This panel will compare the NEPA and CERCLA processes exploring the specific objectives and exclusions of each policy, identifying changes since each policy was originally enacted, and considering whether coordinated consideration of these processes can facilitate better planning and decision-making. The CERCLA process gets more into the design and cost of implementation, as compared to NEPA. The culmination of the CERCLA environmental review process is a Record of Decision whereby the responsible agency documents its selection of the preferred remedial action(s) and associated approaches and measures to meet remedial objectives. As CERCLA-based response actions have become more complex, however, the question has been raised as to whether this environmental review in the typical CERCLA feasibility study truly provides a “functionally equivalent” analysis consistent with the requirements and objectives of NEPA. Instructors: Gary Riley Gary Riley, an EPA CERCLA Project Manager will give the regulating agency perspective highlighting the pros and cons of broader NEPA consideration. Mr. Riley is a California P.E., Environmental Engineer. Before the EPA, he worked for the RWQCB. Mr. Riley currently works on two California mining sites, Sulphur Bank Mercury Mine and Lava Cap Mine. John Lucero John Lucero of E2 Consulting Engineers will provide a consultant's perspective of both broad and focused NEPA consideration, the constraints and benefits of each level of analysis, the public and regulatory agency perception , and how the NEPA review can help streamline feasibility review and guide the decision decision-making process. John is a California and Arizona PE., Environmental Engineer nad has worked on CERCLA sites in 1983. Leslie Tice Leslie Tice of E2 Consulting Engineers will facilitate the discussion. She is a senior NEPA and CEQA practitioner with a blended experience base. She has completed CERCLA, NEPA, and CEQA analyses and provided senior technical review for the NEPA-like environmental review on CERCLA projects. | |
As a service to its members, the American Planning Association (APA), together with its professional institute the
American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP), provides listings of Certification Maintenance (CM) training opportunities.
These listings are registered and approved for CM credit by APA, but APA is not affiliated with the parties listed here.
Appearance in these listings should not be taken as an endorsement, guarantee, or warranty by APA, nor does APA assume any
responsibility or liability for any acts or omissions by persons or entities providing the professional training in these listings.
For further information regarding the professional training listed, please contact the registered provider.
| |