Financing Required PlanningThis Chapter contains various model statutes that authorize methods of financing the planning activities authorized and required elsewhere in the Guidebook. Sections 13-101 through 13-103 authorize local governments to adopt and impose taxes to finance planning: a property tax, real property transfer tax, and a development excise tax. Section 13-104 is concerned with the dedicated purposes to which the special tax revenue may be put. Section 13-201 is the Smart Growth Technical Assistance Act. It creates a state program under which grants may be made to regional planning agencies and local governments to support their "smart growth" planning activities. Smart growth is a defined term with a flexible but specified meaning that at its essence is compact and mixed-use development that increases choices in transportation and opportunities for personal interaction. Additionally, the state planning agency is directed to gather and distribute model plans and ordinances that encourage smart growth and to provide educational resources, training, and other technical assistance regarding the principles and methods of smart growth. Chapter OutlineLocal Tax Financing of Planning13-101 Real Property Tax to Finance Planning Technical and Financial Assistance for Planning13-201 Smart Growth Technical Assistance Act Cross-References for Sections in Chapter 13Section No. Cross-Reference to Section No. 13-102 8-103 13-201 4-103 Local Tax Financing of PlanningCommentary: Local Financing of Planning ActivitiesThe planning activities of a local government are multifold, and are not inexpensive. Studies must be performed, data gathered, hearings held, and existing regulations reviewed. Planning agencies must employ planning professionals and clerks, provide office supplies, and purchase information resources. In the absence of a special source of funding, these activities are financed from the general fund of the local treasury. However, there may be circumstances where it is desirable for planning officials to have a separate, dedicated, revenue stream. Three means of providing such a source of funding are an assessment under the existing real property tax structure, a tax on real property transfers, and a development excise tax. The real property transfer tax is essentially a flat sum to be paid at the time of recordation of a deed or other document that transfers ownership of land within the local government. The development excise tax is rather unique, and requires a more in-depth explanation. Development Excise Taxes[1] A development excise tax is different in fundamental ways from a real property tax or a real property transfer tax. It is imposed on the activity of developing land, is proportional to the density or intensity of the development, and is an obligation of the developer. This is in contrast to the real property tax, which is assessed against the value of real property and is an obligation of the property owner, or the property transfer tax, which is also paid by the land owner but in the form of a flat fee at the time he or she records the deed that grants them title. These differences are relevant to the extent that the state constitution or statutes provide different procedural or substantive requirements for property and excise taxes. For example, uniformity clauses in state constitutions often require that all real property subject to a real property tax must constitute a single classification. For example, distinct tax rates or valuation formulas for residential and non-residential property would run afoul of such provisions.[2] Development excise taxes are also distinct from impact fees. The purpose of impact fees is at least partially regulatory — to ensure that development projects pay their full cost — while the purpose of a development excise tax is to raise revenue. Therefore, a development excise tax is not subject to the "rational nexus" or "rough proportionality" requirements applicable to impact fees.[3] Because of these differences, state courts are concerned with the actual nature or character of particular taxes, and may consider a tax that is called one thing to actually have the characteristics of a different class of taxes. "The nature of a tax must be determined by its operation, rather than by any particular descriptive language which may have been applied to it."[4] The single biggest legal obstacle to any tax ordinance is that it may be deemed a form of taxation which the local government has no statutory authority to adopt. The adoption of a development excise tax enabling statute like the model below should inherently resolve any issues of statutory authorization, but there are other legal issues. To ensure that an excise tax on development activities is not deemed a property tax, it should be an obligation of the developer, not the owner of the premises, it should not be secured by a lien on the property developed, and the amount of the tax should not be based on the value of the property.[5] In order to distinguish a development excise tax from an impact fee, it should have no regulatory functions or purposes, should tax the development activity and not the property developed, should not be an obligation of the land owner, and payment of the tax should not be a condition precedent for the issuance of a development permit. [6] The dedication of development excise tax revenue to financing planning might raise some concerns, since the "earmarking" or dedication of funds is a hallmark of impact fees. However, many measures clearly intended to be revenue generators only are also dedicated, so the use of development excise tax revenue to finance planning activities alone should not be a problem unless there is clear precedent to the contrary in one's particular state. State Statutes Arizona authorizes counties to impose a $2 real property transfer tax in addition to the recording fee.[7] The statute exempts several forms of transfer that do not constitute a substantive change in ownership (placing property into or out of a trust, "straw man" transactions to create a joint or common tenancy, transfers between commonly-owned corporate entities), that transfer interests other than full legal and equitable title (mortgages, liens, and security interests; easements and profits), that clear up title without changing it (partitions, deeds to clarify or confirm earlier deeds), and that are not engaged in for financial gain (deeds of gift, deeds transferring title between spouses or between parents and children).[8] The tax must be paid before a transfer document will be accepted for recording,[9] and it is a misdemeanor for an employee of the recorder to accept a document without payment of the tax or proof of an exemption.[10] California cities and counties may adopt a real property transfer tax.[11] Counties, and cities where the county has not adopted a transfer tax, may impose a rate of 55 cents per $500 of value of the property transferred.[12] A city located in a county with a transfer tax may collect only half that amount under its own transfer tax, and the county must grant a credit equal to the city transfer tax so that the total transfer tax does not exceed 55 cents per $500.[13] The tax is payable to the county by either the grantor or the grantee,[14] and applies to transfers of mobile homes.[15] In addition to repeating many of the exemptions from the Arizona statute[16], California exempts transfers pursuant to or in implementation of a bankruptcy.[17] No deed or other document transferring an interest in land may be filed without proof of payment of the tax or of exemption from it.[18] Illinois[19] imposes a real estate transfer tax of 50 cents per $500 of value.[20] It provides a list of exemptions similar to that in the Arizona statute,[21] and no deed or other document transferring title may be recorded unless it bears a stamp demonstrating that the tax was paid or an affidavit is presented proving that the transfer is exempt.[22] Illinois authorizes municipalities[23] and home-rule counties[24] to impose their own real estate transfer tax, but only upon approval by referendum after holding one or more public hearings. Non-home-rule counties may impose a real estate transfer tax without referendum, but are expressly required to employ the exemptions of the state real property transfer tax statute[25] and are limited to a tax rate of 25 cents per $500 of property value.[26] Upon the request of a county with a real property transfer tax, the tax stamp required by the state transfer tax will not be issued until the county transfer tax has also been paid.[27] Maryland has recently adopted a development excise tax enabling statute for Cecil County.[28] The county cannot adopt such a tax without first holding a public hearing after due notice. The tax may be imposed on the construction of residential units anywhere in the county (including within municipalities) at the time a building permit is obtained, and may not exceed $3500 per residential unit. The revenues from the tax are to be deposited in a capital facilities improvement fund and may be spent only on capital projects that create, or increase the capacity of, public facilities or on debt service on bonds for such capital projects. Massachusetts[29] has a tax on real property transfers, at a rate of $2 for a transfer of interest in land valued between $100 and $500 and $2 for every $500 thereafter (except in Barnstable county, where the excise tax is $1.50 per additional $500).[30] 42.5% of the revenue goes into the Deed Transfer Fund of the county where the land is located,[31] and is disbursed from there to the Corrections Fund (75%), the county general fund (15%), and for the modernization and automation of land transfer records (10%)[32]. Transfers to or from the Federal government, the Commonwealth, or to a city or town are exempt,[33] and the tax is payable by either the grantor or the grantee.[34] Ohio counties, townships, and municipalities may assess a property tax in excess of the statutory 10-mill limit for the purpose of funding regional planning, if approved by two-thirds of the legislative body and by a referendum.[35] Ohio law[36] also authorizes counties to collect a real property transfer tax, not to exceed 30 cents per $100 of value of the property being transferred.[37] The statute includes a series of exemptions[38] which is very similar to the exemptions in the Arizona transfer tax statute. The county real property transfer tax may be accompanied by a tax on the transfer of manufactured housing, payable by the grantor, at the same tax rate as the real property transfer tax.[39] A reduction in the tax rate may be granted to property, either real property or manufactured housing, that has received a tax reduction certificate for its homestead status.[40] Development Excise Tax Ordinances Boulder, Colorado. The development excise tax ordinance in Boulder[41] applies equally to new development and to existing development in territory being annexed to the city[42], and also applies to the addition of residential units or non-residential floor area to existing development.[43] Non-residential units pay a rate of $1.97 per square foot, while attached residential units and mobile homes pay $2,871.40 per unit and detached residential units pay $4,460.99 each.[44] The tax revenue is to be paid into three special, dedicated funds: the Capital Development Fund, Transportation Development Fund, and Permanent Park and Recreation Fund.[45] The City Council is empowered to grant credits to developers who provide capital improvements, development improvements, or park and recreation improvements equivalent to the tax, or who provide affordable housing or engage in development in urban renewal areas.[46] The development excise tax constitutes a lien on the property, and unpaid development excise tax can be collected by the county treasurer if the city manager certifies the unpaid taxes to the treasurer.[47] Napa, California.[48] All new residential, commercial, and industrial development in Napa must pay a development excise tax.[49]Each new residential unit pays $125, while commercial development is taxed one cent per square foot and industrial development pays one-half cent per square foot (in both cases gross floor area including parking)[50], and the tax revenue may be spent only on the construction and expansion of "city fire stations, municipal buildings, and community parks."[51] Development that replaces destroyed development is excluded from the tax so long as construction begins within six months of the destruction[52], and the tax exempts development by governments, charitable, religious, and educational institutions, insurance companies, and banks.[53] The tax is payable by "the person by or on behalf of whom a residential, commercial or industrial unit or building or mobile home park is constructed whether such person is the owner or a lessee of the land,"[54] and is due before a building permit may be issued.[55] No construction may occur, and no constructed building may be occupied, until the tax is paid,[56] and the city is empowered to collect unpaid tax through a civil action in court.[57] A refund is due if the developer proves to the satisfaction of the finance director that the development on which the tax was paid did not occur.[58] Overland Park, Kansas. This large Kansas City suburb has a development excise tax that is levied against the act of subdividing or platting real property.[59] The tax is assessed at a rate of 14.5 cents per square foot of land as indicated on the plat, and must be paid before, and as a condition precedent of, recordation of the final plat. The tax revenue is paid into the general fund of the city treasury. Exemptions are available under the excise tax ordinance for land platted by the city itself, for land zoned agricultural where all parcels are five acres or greater, detached accessory buildings that are incidental to a main building, additions to single-family houses that will not change the primary use, and minor additions that will not change the character, extent, or intensity of the existing development and do not constitute more than 10 percent of the pre-existing floor area. There is also provision for a rebate of the excise tax where development was subject to both the excise tax and to the old exaction for thoroughfare improvements which it replaced. The Overland Park ordinance was sustained by the Kansas Court of Appeals, which held, inter alia, that the ordinance was not a tax upon the use of real property or upon the rendering of a service, but was nevertheless a revenue measure rather than a regulatory one.[60] Provisions of the Model Sections Section 13-101 authorizes a real property tax assessment dedicated to finance
planning. The Section includes a provision whereby an adopting state can set
an upper limit on the tax rate, based on the particular features and circumstances
of their state's real property tax system. The details of assessment, collection,
distribution, and appeal or review of the tax are not addressed in the Section,
as they are best handled under the state's existing statutes on real property
taxes. A development excise tax is authorized by Section 13-103. The local government must expressly provide a formula for assessing the tax, a procedure for collection of the tax, a procedure for appealing assessments, and a procedure for refunding the tax when the development activity upon which the tax was paid did not actually occur. The development excise tax does not apply to development by governmental units or by tax-exempt not-for-profits engaging in development activities within the limits of that exemption. Local governments are also authorized to exempt certain socially-beneficial types of development, such as affordable housing, when a clear policy in the local comprehensive plan calls for it. Otherwise, the tax is intended to apply to all land uses and all types of development: a local government cannot adopt a development excise tax applicable only to residential property, for instance. Section 13-104 provides that the revenue from all three taxes referred to above is to be placed in a special account, separate from the general fund of the local treasury, and spent only on planning activities, as defined in the Section. It also clarifies that the special planning taxes are not intended to be exclusive; general appropriations to finance planning activities may be made in addition to the dedicated revenue. 13-101 Real Property Tax to Finance Planning (1) The legislative body of a local government may impose a local planning property tax in the manner provided by this Section. (2) The purpose of a local planning property tax is to raise revenue to finance the planning activities of the local government. (3) For the purposes of this Section, and any other Section where a local planning property tax is referred to, a "local planning property tax" is an tax levied against the value of real property in the local government pursuant to the [cite real property tax law] in order to finance the planning activities of the local government. (4) A local planning property tax:
13-102 Real Property Transfer Tax to Finance Planning (1) The legislative body of a local government may adopt and amend a real property transfer tax to finance planning according to the procedure for the adoption and amendment of land development regulations pursuant to Section [8-103, or cite to some other provisions, such as a municipal charter or state statute governing the adoption of ordinances.] (2) The purpose of a real property transfer tax pursuant to this Section is to raise revenue to finance the planning activities of the local government. (3) For the purposes of this Section,
(4) A real property transfer tax to finance planning may be adopted and amended only through a property transfer tax ordinance pursuant to this Section. A property transfer tax ordinance shall include the following minimum provisions:
(5) Before adopting a property transfer tax ordinance, the local government shall request in writing from the county [recorder of deeds or equivalent official] a reasonable estimate of the cost of performing the duties of the [recorder of deeds] pursuant to this Section.
(6) Within [30] days of adopting or amending a property transfer tax ordinance, the local government shall inform the county [recorder of deeds or equivalent official] in writing of the effective date of the ordinance and the amount of the real property transfer tax.
(7) The payment of a real property transfer tax and administrative fee pursuant to this Section is the obligation of the grantee, and is a joint obligation of all grantees if there is more than one grantee. • This provision is not likely to come into play in most circumstances, as the tax is to be paid before the document may be recorded. However, it is still a good idea to state clearly who has the legal obligation to pay. (8) A grantee against whom a real property transfer tax and administrative fee have been assessed may pay the tax and fee and preserve the right to review the assessment by:
• Without such a provision, the requirement of payment before a real property transfer document may be recorded could effectively require a grantee to waive their right to challenge the tax in order to get their deed recorded. 13-103 Development Excise Tax to Finance Planning (1) The legislative body of a local government may adopt and amend a development
excise tax according to the procedure for the adoption and amendment of land
development regulations pursuant to Section [8-103, or cite to some other
provisions, such as a municipal charter or state statute governing the adoption
of ordinances.] (3) As used in this Section, and in any other Section where development excise taxes are referred to:
• Under Section 8-502, on the protection of nonconformities, a nonconforming building or structure that is destroyed may be rebuilt so long as less than half of its useable area was destroyed. Needless to say, if a building that is in compliance with all present land development regulations is destroyed, it may be rebuilt in compliance with those regulations regardless of the percentage of its area that was destroyed.
(4) A development excise tax may be adopted and amended only through a development excise tax ordinance pursuant to this Section. A development excise tax ordinance shall include the following minimum provisions:
• Under the provisions of Chapter 11, the local government may employ an administrative enforcement procedure or may resort immediately to a civil action in the courts. Criminal proceedings for intentional violations are also authorized.
(5) A development excise tax ordinance may include provisions:
(6) Any developer against whom a development excise tax has been assessed may seek a review of the assessment. The procedure for such a review shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 10 for review of land-use decisions except where the provisions of this paragraph are to the contrary.
(7) When a developer pays development excise tax in anticipation or advance of development activity, and that development activity does not occur by the development completion date, the local government shall refund to the developer the portion of the development excise tax representing the development activity that did not occur and the interest thereon.
• The developer is in the best position to know how much of the projected development activity actually occurred. Also, requiring the developer to actively seek the refund will reduce the occurrence of inefficient cases where de minimis refunds must be processed and may be disputed.
13-104 Disposition of Revenue from Planning Taxes (1) All revenues generated by one or more of the following:
(2) The funds deposited into the special account, and the interest earned thereon, shall be expended only upon:
(3) Paragraph (2) above notwithstanding, any:
(4) Nothing in this Section prohibits a local government that has imposed a local planning property tax, a real property transfer tax to finance planning, or a development excise tax from appropriating funds from other sources, including the general fund of the local government treasury, for the purposes and functions enumerated in paragraph (2) above. Financial and Technical Assistance for PlanningCommentary: Smart Growth Technical Assistance ActThe following model is a "Smart Growth Technical Assistance Act," based upon a bill that was introduced in the Illinois Senate in 1999.[61] It is intended to encourage innovation in the preparation of local comprehensive plans and land development regulations through an incentive grant program that is based on the principles of "smart growth," a phrase that draws its definition from a 1998 Planning Advisory Service Report by APA.[62] Under this model, the state planning agency is charged with administering the grant program, including the adoption of rules. In addition, the model statute directs the agency to make available to regional planning agencies and local governments a variety of technical assistance materials and training. Finally, it requires the completion of an annual report to the governor and state legislature regarding activities undertaken pursuant to the Section. 13-201 Smart Growth Technical Assistance Act (1) This Section shall be known as the Smart Growth Technical Assistance Act. (2) The purposes of this Section are to:
(3) As used in this Section, "Smart Growth" means planning, regulatory, and development practices and techniques founded upon and promoting the following principles:
(4) The [state planning agency] is hereby authorized to make grants to [regional planning agencies] and local governments to develop, update, administer, and implement comprehensive plans and land development regulations, including development incentives, that conform to the principles of smart growth.
(5) The [state planning agency]:
(6) The [state planning agency] may employ or retain private for-profit
and not-for-profit organizations, [regional planning agencies], and universities
to provide consultation, technical assistance, and training regarding any
activity that it undertakes pursuant to paragraph (4) above.
(8) The [state planning agency] shall use monies appropriated to the Smart Growth Technical Assistance Fund, a special fund created in the state treasury, to implement and administer the purposes of this Section. | ||