Historic PAS Report SeriesPAS published its first Information Report in 1949. To celebrate this history, each month we're presenting a new report from the archives. We hope you enjoy this month's fascinating snapshot of a planning issue of yesteryear.
Nursing HomesDownload original report (pdf) Prepared by Frank S. So The increase in the number and proportion of the aged is making an impact on our cities. ASPO Planning Advisory Service Information Report No. 148, Planning and an Aging Population (July 1961), summarized population trends that are resulting in an increase in the number of older people and discussed some of the planning implications of these trends. Statistics concerning this growth have been quoted often enough to be implanted in the reader's mind and need not be repeated here. Similarly, planners are aware of how the change in age distribution can influence planning programs and land use controls. The recent interest in special housing facilities for the aged, and the special zoning and subdivision provisions to allow the facilities, is one example of the planning problem created. This report will examine one small facet of the problem that planning agencies must face in dealing with an aging population — the nursing home. The number of nursing homes in our cities has been steadily increasing. With this increase has come friction, particularly in the location of nursing homes as controlled by zoning ordinances. Traditionally, zoning ordinances have either been silent on the subject or have allowed the nursing home in high-density residential districts or in commercial districts. Recently there has been some discussion and rethinking of the special needs of this kind of facility. This report will summarize some basic characteristics of nursing homes, examine changes in the facilities, and will present excerpts from zoning ordinances that deal with nursing homes on more than a perfunctory basis. A word of caution is in order. A nursing home is a medical-related facility. Regulation of many of the operational and administrative characteristics are outside the area of competence and responsibility of the typical planning agency. Consequently, the report will discuss only those aspects of nursing homes that are related to land use controls. There is a great deal of literature on the general subject and anyone seeking more detailed information should consult the bibliography at the end of this report. Definitions Definitions and classification of facilities were developed by the U.S. Public Health Service and used in a 1961 inventory of nursing home facilities.1 First, there are definitions of the type of care provided:
In addition, there are classifications of facilities by kind of facility and type of care provided: Kind of Facility*
*As classified by the States, generally for licensure purposes. Type of Care Provided**
**According to definitions above. For licensing purposes, the definitions will vary from state to state. The planning agency should become conversant with state and local definitions and classifications since they are important to health and medical authorities. However, they may or may not be suitable for zoning ordinance definitions. Growth Trends The 1961 nursing homes inventory conducted by the Public Health Service counted 23,000 non-hospital facilities in the United States and territories providing nursing or supportive care to the aged and chronically ill of all ages. This total is 2,000 less than the figure reported in a similar survey undertaken in 1954. However, the resident capacity increased from 450,000 beds to 592,800 — a 32 per cent increase.2 In terms of kind of facility, there were an estimated 11,600 nursing or convalescent homes with 369,300 beds; 11,400 other facilities for the aged with 223,500 beds. The latter category included homes for the aged, boarding homes for the aged, rest homes, and similar facilities. About nine out of ten of the nursing homes, providing about three-fourths of all the beds, are operated commercially. Their median size is 24 beds. Other kinds of facilities such as homes for the aged, are also under proprietary auspices. These homes are generally small, with the following median size: homes for the aged, 19 beds; boarding homes, 8 beds; and rest homes, 13 beds. Personal care is the primary function of nearly 90 per cent of all homes for the aged, boarding homes for the aged, and rest homes. In homes for the aged and rest homes, skilled nursing care is available either as a primary or as an adjunct service to more than 1/2 the resident bed capacity. Nursing services are available in only one out of 8 beds in boarding homes for the aged. The 23,000 homes are broadly grouped by primary type of service as follows: 9,700 skilled nursing care homes; 11,100 personal care homes; 2,200 residential care facilities. The greatest growth has occurred in skilled nursing care homes. Since 1954, they have increased from a total of 7,000 to 9,700 homes — an increase of 39 per cent. Total bed capacity has nearly doubled from the 180,000 beds in 1954 to 338,700 in 1961. Almost all of these beds were reported to have skilled nursing service. The number of personal care homes has grown from 9,000 with 190,000 beds to 11,000 with 207,100 beds. However the number of residential care facilities has decreased from 9,000 homes with 80,000 beds to 2,200 homes with 47,000 beds. The survey showed a wide variation among the states in the supply of skilled nursing care beds. In general, the bed-population ratio increases with the average state per capita income, the amount of old age assistance payments, the relative number of persons aged 65 and over, and the proportion of the population living in urban areas. The following tables, which summarize the PHS survey results by each of these characteristics, can be quite useful in determining the potential market for nursing home facilities: Population Aged 65 Years and Over
*Includes territories. Per Capita Income
Rural and Urban Distribution
Old-Age Assistance Payments
Skilled nursing homes are larger than they were about a decade ago, according to the survey. The median size is approximately 25 beds, compared to 19 beds in 1954 and varies from small establishments of less than 10 beds to a few large facilities of 500 beds and over. The percentage frequency distribution of skilled nursing care facilities in terms of the proportion of facilities in each size category as well as the proportion of beds in each size category are shown in the following tables: Facilities
Beds
Size also varies according to ownership. Publicly owned facilities are the largest with an average of 61 beds. Skilled nursing homes under proprietary ownership average 24 beds. Homes connected with church groups average 50 beds while other types of nonprofit homes average 39 beds. Approximately 87 per cent of the skilled nursing homes are owned by proprietary interests. However, while proprietary homes account for nearly 9 out of 10 homes, they provide little more than 7 out of 10 beds. Finally, nearly 9 out of 10 skilled nursing homes have at least one full-time registered professional nurse or licensed practical nurse. Location Factors and Zoning ProvisionsAlthough there are many standards for construction and interior facilities of nursing homes, there are few standards useful to planners. Almost all sources consulted in the preparation of this report contain general, rather than specific location standards. A typical example is found in the Public Health Service's Nursing Home Standards Guide:3
The small amount of literature available on location factors emphasizes that nursing homes ought not to be located out in the country, but in the city where community activities go on. In the words of one observer, a nursing home should be located on land that is evaluated by the front foot rather than by the acre. Most of our elderly have lived in cities all their lives and do not want to be shipped off to the country. Unfortunately, there is a shortage of nursing home facilities in neighborhoods close to friends and families in the city. In general, the facilities in such locations are the ones with long waiting lists. While there is unanimous agreement that residential types of environments are most desirable for nursing homes, this objective may appear to conflict with an important principal of planning: a residential neighborhood should be protected against uses that are detrimental or incompatible with a desirable living environment. This conflict is perhaps the central issue when zoning provisions for nursing homes are discussed. The conflict has come about because traditional zoning seeks to segregate residential uses and to protect single-family areas as the most desirable areas in a community. Because of this, the great majority of zoning ordinances have always placed nursing and convalescent homes in the highest density, multi-family districts, as well as in commercial districts. An unpublished study of the Los Angeles Welfare Planning Council (1959) showed that only 6 out of 46 cities in the greater Los Angeles area permitted nursing homes or related facilities in R-l zones. Although the trend is by no means universal, there is evidence of a growing acceptance of the principle that these uses should be more freely dispersed throughout residential areas. The influence and impact of nursing homes on single-family neighborhoods was studied in Richmond, California. Following a number of heated public hearings on the subject, the planning commission listed the major reasons given by various people who claimed that a nursing home would adversely affect the neighborhood.4 It was believed that a nursing home would:
The planning commission took these arguments and tested them by studying the residential areas surrounding three small nursing homes. Two homes contained bed patients; the other, ambulatory patients. A questionnaire was used to sample neighborhood opinion. In addition, an analysis of various kinds of public records was also made. When neighborhood residents were asked if they were aware of the existence of a care home in the neighborhood, approximately 90 per cent were aware of the home. About one-fourth stated that they had lived in the neighborhood for periods varying from six months to two years before learning that the care home existed. All agreed that the present care home residents were very quiet. None of the neighbors had noticed a siren being used. About half had never noticed an ambulance calling at the home, and the other half had noticed an ambulance only at infrequent intervals. When asked about traffic problems respondents stated that in general there were "no problems." The only exceptions were two next-door residents, who said that occasionally visitors to the homes would park in front of their homes. However, there was no complaint in one case where off-street parking was provided. Neighbors unanimously stated there was no effect at all on the play of their children. Ninety-five per cent of the neighbors said there had been no effect at all on property values, and the remainder said that they did not know. When asked whether or not they had become acquainted with the residents of the care home, neighbors of the two care homes with bed patients responded that there was little contact. But in the case of the home with ambulatory residents, most of the respondents had often observed the people taking walks about the neighborhood, and chatting with both children and adults. The trend of the comments clearly indicated that the neighborhood had experienced no difficulty or deterioration because of the care home. Some surprise was expressed that the city should be investigating the matter as a "problem." Many people mentioned the fact that the way the home was conducted seemed to be important. Neighborhood residents were of the opinion that there might be problems with a very large nursing home, or if several small homes were located close together. Other sources of information, including assessor's records, city traffic and engineering offices, and the only ambulance service, were investigated. The planning commission concluded:5
Other planners and public agencies have also given careful thought to the location of nursing homes. Appendix A contains a policy statement prepared by the California chapter of the American Institute of Planners in cooperation with the Welfare Planning Council of the Los Angeles Region. This statement essentially states that boarding homes for the well-aged are comparable to boarding homes for persons of any age and should be permitted in the same locations that any boarding homes may be permitted. The policy statement concluded that it is appropriate for nursing facilities to be in multiple-residential zones. In this sense, the policy statement does not go as far as some recent zoning ordinances in permitting nursing homes in lower density residential zones. Other points may be found in the policy statement in Appendix A. Zoning Trends and Characteristics Appendix B contains the zoning text provisions, covering nursing homes from eight selected zoning ordinances. These ordinances go into more than usual detail, and with one exception, have been adopted within the past four years. Many of the ordinances contained similar provisions, but differ somewhat in treatment of details. The significant trend in zoning for nursing homes is to permit them in single-family residential districts. The zoning ordinance of Richmond, California, includes nursing homes as a permitted use in its R-l single-family district. However, these homes may have a maximum capacity of only six persons. Homes for seven or more persons are permitted in the R-2 multiple-family district, the next zoning district after the R-l single-family district. At the same time, a larger home may be permitted in any zoning district as a conditional use, if it meets certain requirements imposed by the commission. Other zoning ordinances also permit nursing homes in single-family districts. However, they are not permitted as a matter of right but are handled through special permit or conditional use provisions. The zoning ordinances of Baltimore, Seattle, Santa Rosa, and the Maryland-Washington District fall into this category. Two of the ordinances, Minneapolis and New Haven, do not permit nursing homes in the first single-family districts. Minneapolis first permits them as a conditional use in the second, multi-family (R-4) district. New Haven treats them as a special exception in the R-l low-medium density district. This is the third residential district, following two single-family districts. Another approach is used in Tacoma. The Tacoma ordinance has a special medical center transitional district which can be combined with various other districts. Nursing homes are a permitted use in this district. Details of the ordinance can be found in Appendix B. Most of the ordinances in Appendix B contain reasonably detailed definitions of nursing and convalescent homes. The definitions vary considerably, depending upon whether the ordinance is attempting to differentiate by size of institutions, whether nursing care is permitted, whether it is desired to differentiate between nursing homes and lodging homes or other homes for the aged, whether mental disorders are considered, and whether hospitals and various kinds of clinics are specifically excluded. In drafting definitions, it is desirable to differentiate between nursing homes and hospitals and other medical facilities. In addition, the definition should be related to state and local health and welfare definitions, as well as to those kinds and capacities of nursing homes that are being operated. Two problems seem to be evident. First, although it may be desirable to regulate on the basis of bed capacity, it appears as if the majority of nursing homes may fall into the upper limits of the breakdowns that are contained in definitions of size. For example, an ordinance may permit nursing homes of less than six beds in a particular district. Yet these may only be a handful that are this small, and in effect would exclude nursing homes as permitted uses. Ordinance drafters need to be careful not to encourage or give favorable treatment to marginal operators. Second, it may be undesirable, in the long run, to differentiate between lodging homes for the aged and nursing homes. More than one authority has pointed out that if the average age of the resident of a lodging home for the aged is now between 65 and 70, ten years hence many of the same residents will still be residing in the lodging home. Often they will require extensive nursing care. Many operators of nursing homes originally operated lodging homes and found that it was necessary to add nursing care as their residents became older. Most of the ordinances also contain minimum lot size and dimension requirements. In general, the provisions have two characteristics. First, as the number of beds increases, the lot area requirements increase. Second, as the land use intensity of the zoning district increases, the lot size requirements decrease. Although a few ordinances have no minimum lot areas that are specifically required for nursing homes, the smallest encountered is 6,000 square feet and the largest is 40,000 square feet. It would not be useful to try to determine an average; however, 10,000, 15,000 and 20,000 square feet appear most frequently as minimum lot area requirements. While yard requirements also vary considerably, the tendency is to require greater yards that for residential uses in the same zoning district. In addition, landscaping and screening requirements are required in a number of ordinances. These kinds of requirements serve two purposes. First, to protect the adjacent residential uses, by some visual barrier and second, to provide an outdoor privacy for nursing home residents. One of the knottiest problems in zoning regulations for nursing homes has been the problem of conversion of existing large dwellings. Although none of the ordinances examined contain completely adequate provisions in this regard, a few of them do have some pertinent provisions. For example, the Baltimore ordinance contains minimum floor space requirements for sleeping rooms. This kind of requirement can prevent overcrowding. The Baltimore ordinance also requires that a nursing home be a completely detached structure (presumably to exclude row houses), no part of which is used for any other purpose. The building must also be accessible for fire fighting purposes and evacuation at all levels of the structure and on three sides. Depending on state and local health regulations, some of these aspects of building and interior design may be regulated in other laws. However, the planning agency ought to be aware of what is covered in other legislation. To insure adherence to such regulations before passing on the zoning, the Baltimore ordinance provides that written approval from the State Department of Health, the City Health Department, the Fire Department, and any other legally responsible agency must be received before the Board of Adjustment will make its decision. An indirect regulation to control conversions is the limitation of the height of nursing homes to one story. This requirement would generally rule out the older, large single-family residences. Parking requirements for nursing homes vary considerably. (See Appendices B and C.) Some requirements are based on floor area. The majority are based on a ratio of parking spaces to beds. Many ordinances also gear their requirements on a combination of the number of beds, employees, and doctors. It is difficult to arrive at a single standard for parking facilities for such a specific use as nursing homes. However, in addition to the provisions cited in the Appendix, two recommendations have been made by other sources. The Highway Research Board in Bulletin No. 24, Zoning for Parking Facilities, published in 1950, suggested that one parking space be provided for each six patient beds, plus one space for each staff or visiting doctor, plus one space for each four employees, including nurses. More recently, the American Nursing Homes Association suggested that generally, one parking space for each four beds is sufficient. The Association expressed concern with some municipalities that require parking ratios similar to hospital requirements. The Highway Research Board study concluded that all other things being equal, the convalescent home requires fewer parking spaces on a unit basis than a hospital because the number and frequency of visitors is substantially less. ConclusionsThe problem of appropriate zone locations for nursing homes is by no means solved. In the past the nursing home was relegated to high-density residential and commercial districts. Now there is the recognition that they were often inappropriately located and that perhaps certain kinds of homes can be located in single-family residential areas. A number of zoning ordinances now permit this. One study has concluded that small nursing homes have a negligible impact on single-family areas and neighbors have few or no objections. However, this is the only study and it does not test impact or reaction to larger homes. The question of whether nursing homes should be permitted in single-family areas is also influenced by a number of other, perhaps intangible, factors. The impression the public has of a nursing home is influenced by the fact that many nursing homes in the past (and in the present, too) were old, run-down, ill-maintained, fire-traps. In addition, the public sees a nursing home and a boarding house as much alike. Not only does the prospect of a boarding house bring anxiety to neighbors, but, quite correctly, they saw the existence or conversion of a dwelling to a rooming house as a sure sign that the neighborhood was going downhill. With the growth in the number of nursing homes, the quality of maintenance, operation and construction has improved considerably. Increasing interest in all aspects of housing and caring for the aged has brought suggestions from health and welfare officials to the effect that is desirable to locate facilities for the aged in a normal residential environment. The typical zoning ordinance deals with the nursing home in very general fashion. A few now set up requirements in some detail. In response to the recommendations from various planners and health authorities that nursing homes be permitted in single-family districts, some cities have amended their ordinances to permit this. However, they are seldom permitted directly without special review. The approach is to permit them as a conditional or a special permit use if they meet certain size and development requirements. As yet there are no generally accepted standards, but a range of them are in use in various combinations. Items of regulation and control include: definitions, size, ownership, minimum sleeping room sizes, minimum lot area and dimensions, height, site plans, distance from other kinds of zoning districts, exclusion from commercial and industrial areas, access for fire fighting, approval of health officials, screening and landscaping, and off-street parking. In addition to zoning requirements, there are many other regulatory agencies with various functional areas of interest that should be consulted before drafting new zoning controls. Finally, this report should be looked upon as a progress report rather than any statement of recommendations that ought to be followed in every city. If the report encourages more critical thinking about the proper place of the nursing home in the community, then it will have served its purpose. References1. Nursing Home Standards Guide, U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, Public Health Service Publication No. 827, 1961, pp. 33-34. 2. Hugh B. Speir, Characteristics of Nursing Homes and Related Facilities: Report of a 1961 Nationwide Inventory. U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, Division of Hospital and Medical Facilities, 1963. 3. Ibid., pp. 1-2. 4. Care of Homes in Richmond, City Planning Commission, Richmond, California, July, 1958. pp. 3-4. 5. Ibid., pp. 5-8. BibliographyCare Facilities for the Aged. A Report to the Planning Commission by the Department of Planning and Development. Santa Rosa, California. June, 1961. Care Homes in Richmond. City Planning Commission. Richmond, California. July, 1958. Characteristics of Nursing Homes and Related Facilities: Report of a 1961 Nationwide Inventory. U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service Publication No. 930-F-5, 1963. The Condition of American Nursing Homes. A study by the Subcommittee on Problems of the Aged and Aging of the Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, U. S. Senate, 86th Congress, 2nd Session. 1960. A Guide for Appropriate Nursing Home Facilities. St. Louis County Planning Commission. August, 1963. Minimum Property Standards for Nursing Homes. Federal Housing Administration. Nursing Home Standards Guide. U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service Publication No. 827, 1961. Resources Information on Nursing Home Administration, Nursing Care, Construction and Allied Subjects. Bibliography compiled by the American Nursing Homes Association, 1346 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington 6, D. C. Selected Articles on Nursing Homes. U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service Publication No. 732, 1960. Appendix ACALIFORNIA CHAPTER, AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, OCTOBER, 1956 STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES ON ZONING FOR SHELTER CARE FACILITIES SERVING THE AGING Prepared by the Committee on Zoning for Shelter Care Facilities Serving the Aging, of the Southern Section, California Chapter American Institute of Planning in Cooperation with the Committee on Problems of the Aging of the Welfare Planning Council, Los Angeles Region. Approved for publication by the Executive Board, California Chapter, American Institute of Planners, October 7, 1956.
Edward A. Holden, Chairman Appendix BSELECTED ZONING PROVISIONS CONCERNING NURSING HOMES Baltimore (1963) Definition:
R-l Districts (One Family) — Special exception by board of appeals
Maryland-Washington Regional District, Maryland (1952) Definition:
Minneapolis (1963) Definition:
New Haven (1963) RM 1 Districts: Low-Middle Density (3rd Res. Dist.) — Permitted as special exception.
Richmond, Calif. (1960) Definition:
Santa Rosa, Calif. (Proposed, 1961; partially adopted) Definitions:
Proposed Amendment to Administrative Regulations: Article 4. Boarding Homes for the Aged and Nursing Homes (Use Permit Required in "R" Districts)
Seattle (1961) Definitions:
Tacoma (1962) Definition:
Appendix CPARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR NURSING HOMES IN SELECTED ZONING ORDINANCES
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||