Urban planning might have been born in Chicago ("Make no little plans"), but that was more than a century ago, in a very different city. Today's city is not the product of Daniel Burnham, the White City, or Mrs. O'Leary's cow. It's the Rust Belt Metropolis That Could — the one that has not only thrived but shouldered its way onto the list of global cities. But wh...
About the Authors
D. Bradford Hunt
Jon B. DeVries, AICP, is Director, Marshall Bennett Institute of Real Estate, Roosevelt University, was Director, Strategic Development Planning, URS Corporation for 10 years and previously Principal with Arthur Anderson in the Real Estate and Hospitality Group in Miami and Chicago. As the first Director of the Marshall Bennett Institute of Real Estate, Mr. DeVries has developed a graduate real estate program now rated one of the best in the Midwest. He is co-author with D. Bradford Hunt of Planning Chicago, published in 2013 by the APA Planners Press.
Table of Contents
Part 1: Introduction
Chapter 1: Planning the "Chicago Way"
Chapter 2: Chicago's Planning Context
Part 2: Chicago's Central Area
Chapter 3: The Origins of Chicago's Postindustrial City: Planning Change, 1955-1958
Chapter 4: The High-water Mark of City-led Planning: The 1966 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 5: The Growth Coalition Takes the Lead for Planning
Chapter 6: Chicago's Equity Planning Moment
Chapter 7: Planning in the Void: Redevelopment in the North Loop and Near South
Part 3: Neighborhood Change and Planning Response
Chapter 8: Chicago and Community Planning Innovation
Chapter 9: Englewood
Chapter 10: Uptown
Chapter 11: Little Village
Chapter 12: Remaking Public Housing: The Chicago Housing Authority's Plan for Transformation
Part 4: Industrial Policy in Chicago: City Planning for Industrial Retention and Growth
Chapter 13: Defending the Industrial Base: Sector and District Strategies
Chapter 14: A Changing Employment Scene
Chapter 15: The Calumet District: Planning for Brownfields
Chapter 16: Planning for Global Freight in the Chicago Region
Part 5: Chicago in the Current Era
Chapter 17: The Tourist City: Navy Pier, McCormick Place, and Millennium Park
Chapter 18: The Era of Big Plans Is Over
Chapter 19: The Disconnect Between Financing and Planning
Chapter 20: Positive Middle-Range Planning
Chapter 21: The Lost Decade
Chapter 22: Conclusion: Restore Planning to Chicago
Appendix A: Planning Departments and Leadership, City of Chicago, 1958-2013
Appendix B: Selected List of Plans and Reports, 1957-2012
Appendix C: Industrial Employment Tables
Notes on Interviews
"Hunt and DeVries have delivered a candid and unromantic account of how things get planned — or not planned — in a postindustrial Chicago striving for a place on the short list of truly global cities. Their description of competing forces in the planning process (e.g., a downtown growth coalition vs. neighborhood equity planning) is in the best interpretive tradition of Edward Banfield."
—John McCarron, Urban affairs writer
"Hunt and DeVries have pulled off the impossible: they have produced an impartial treatment of postwar planning in a city where every decision to alter the built environment is politicized and contentious. A combination of meticulous research and years of experience with the projects and policies they describe allow them to navigate this high road. Happily, the authors do not just rehash well-trodden narratives of great men and their grandiose visions for the downtown or Lakefront; planning for neighborhoods, industrial districts, and the Chicago River share the stage with the Loop, filling out our understanding of who makes planning decisions and why they ultimately succeed or fail."
—Rachel Weber, University of Illinois–Chicago
"The book celebrates the best of Chicago's planning but doesn't shy away from asking hard questions, concluding with a call for the reassertion of formal city planning in an era where TIFs and other financial policies serve as a problematic substitute for planning. Hunt and DeVries astutely expose a sobering irony about Chicago: this city, known as a birthplace and showcase of modern American planning, has arguably witnessed the devolution and devaluation of planning in recent decades."
—Scott D. Campbell, Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan