London's Housing Reforms: Lessons on Deregulation for Global Planners

This  Global Perspectives blog series draws from a curated collection of over 75 influential urban planning journals published worldwide, meticulously compiled to foster global communication and enrich collaborative planning discourse. By highlighting groundbreaking research, innovative methodologies, and case studies from diverse contexts — spanning each continent — these posts aim to facilitate knowledge transfer, explore cutting-edge developments, and share contextually relevant solutions that address shared urban challenges and shape the future of planning practice.

Housing shortages are a pressing issue for cities globally, prompting many to adopt deregulation and market-driven strategies to increase supply. London's recent housing reforms provide a detailed case study of how these policies unfold in practice. This blog examines key findings from London's experience, drawing on recent studies to inform urban planners worldwide.

The Policy Shift: Permitted Development Rights (PDR)

In 2013, London introduced Permitted Development Rights (PDR) to expedite housing development. This policy allows commercial buildings to be converted into residential properties with reduced planning oversight, aiming to address the city's housing shortage efficiently.

Research by Ian Chng, Jonathan Reades, and Phil Hubbard (2023) provides insight into the results. Homes created under PDR tend to be smaller than the London average, with about one-third of flats in large schemes falling below recommended minimum standards.

These properties are slightly less costly than other new developments but command higher prices per square meter, indicating a potential shift in development priorities.

Large-scale regeneration projects have reshaped London's public housing estates into mixed-tenure developments, often incorporating upgraded green spaces. Yet, access to these amenities varies across resident groups.

A study by Meri Juntti, Sevda Ozsezer-Kurnuç, and Nicholas Dash (2025) found that social housing residents and younger individuals encounter obstacles in using these spaces. Factors such as perceived ownership and fear of conflict contribute to this disparity, particularly in areas where public spaces have become privatized.

London's housing market has been significantly influenced by financialization processes. Aretousa Bloom's research (2023) examines how local authorities in London have engaged in increasingly speculative forms of urban governance, where social and affordable housing is treated as a financial asset.

Her work focuses on how municipalities are navigating contradictory imperatives between austerity and speculative development through local authority housing companies. This shift in governance affects housing provision and accessibility for London residents.

Global Relevance for Planners

London's housing reforms highlight trends that resonate beyond the city, offering lessons for urban planners in practice:

• Housing Standards: Deregulation can accelerate construction but may compromise unit size and quality. Planners might consider enforcing minimum standards to ensure livability.
• Inclusive Public Spaces: Unequal access to green spaces signals a need for designs that prioritize inclusivity across socio-economic groups.
• Managing Speculation: Rising prices tied to investment activity suggest a role for policies, like taxes on vacant properties, that keep housing accessible.
• Oversight in Deregulation: Streamlined processes require careful monitoring to align outcomes with community needs.

These findings echo challenges in many global cities, where commercial-to-residential conversions favor luxury units, and where speculative investment has inflated housing costs. London's experience underscores the importance of anticipating the broader impacts of market-driven policies.

Top image: iStock/Getty Images Plus/ oversnap